Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option for get_worker_tasks to also return ASSIGNED tasks #264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

querti
Copy link
Collaborator

@querti querti commented Jun 27, 2024

This behavior was recently changed in 1, where this function now only returns OPEN tasks. This caused a regression in our service - which uses a custom task manager. Add an parameter to restore the old behavior. The parameter will be unused by default, so the default behavior remains unchanged.

Refers to CLOUDDST-23359

This behavior was recently changed in [1], where this function now only
returns OPEN tasks. This caused a regression in our service - which uses
a custom task manager. Add an parameter to restore the old behavior. The
parameter will be unused by default, so the default behavior remains
unchanged.

[1]: release-engineering#251
@querti querti marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2024 10:56
@querti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

querti commented Jun 27, 2024

@lzaoral Is this change acceptable for you?

@querti querti merged commit e769532 into release-engineering:master Jul 2, 2024
19 checks passed
@lzaoral
Copy link
Contributor

lzaoral commented Aug 6, 2024

@querti Sorry! I have completely missed this discussion. :/

Yeah, it looks fine me. Either way, I haven't been very active in @openscanhub development for past few months and it's unlikely that it will change anytime soon. Please, tag @siteshwar or @kdudka in the future for comments regarding contributions that may affect @openscanhub. Thank you!

edit: typo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants